SOME THOUGHTS AFTER US OPEN 2023 TENNIS FINALS and compiled data of tennis competitions.
I watched the US Open Men’s Tennis Final earlier today. Novak Djokovic of Serbia was the winner. equaled the record of a total of 24 Major Championships (Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, and US Open) held by Margaret Court of Australia. I started wondering if Djokovic was the greatest singles player of all time. And that threw me into this futile, idle exercise. There are obviously no easy answers to this. It is difficult, perhaps foolhardy, to compare players of different eras. Most notably, the game has become more universal. Oldtimers like Bill Tilden Donald Budge, or Helen Willis Moody did not have to compete with players from so many different countries, most notably from Eastern Europe. On the flip side, the players of the earlier eras did not participate in all the Majors regularly as they do now. Notably, the great Bill Tilden never played in the Australian Open.
Then, there is the variety of court surfaces, each favoring some specific skill sets the grass courts are fast and highly favorable to those more adept at big serves and volleys. The clay courts at the French Open in Paris, by contrast, are slow and demand greater stamina. Some have changed over the years (Australian Open had US Open courts have changed from the earlier Grass Courts to the concrete surfaced hard courts). And finally, there is the transition from the era before 1968 when the major tournaments were limited to the amateurs. It was then opened up to all – the Open Era. This made quite a significant impact, particularly on men’s tennis. Players like Laver, Emerson, Hoad, Rosewall, and others lost a few valuable years of competition. Rosewall, in fact, could not play amateur tennis from 1957 to 1967. I also discovered that other than the US Open, the 3 other Majors were not held from 1940 to 1944 due to the Second World War.
For my ‘study,’ I decided to concentrate on the players of more recent vintage, and thus, primarily the Open Era. That, unfortunately, would leave out some all-time greats like Rod Laver or Ken Rosewall and from an earlier era, Bill Tilden, and Donald Budge, the first winner of the Grand Slam. Budge only had a 5-year run from 1934 to 1938. And within that short time period, he won 6 major titles consecutively from 1937 to 1938. And I have focused entirely on the 4 Majors, fully aware that some tournaments like the Olympics and the year-end WTA Championships have gained much in stature over the years. I also want to note that I rate the Wimbledon and the US Open to be of a higher stature compared to the Australia and the French Opens, due to their consistently high level of universal participation.
Winners of Singles Titles in Major Championships |
||||||
Men |
||||||
Australian |
French |
Wimbledon |
US Open |
Total Wins |
Runners Up |
|
Novak Djokovic |
10 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
24 |
12 |
Rafael Nidal |
2 |
14 |
2 |
4 |
22 |
8 |
Roger Federer |
6 |
1 |
8 |
5 |
20 |
11 |
Pete Sampras |
2 |
0 |
7 |
5 |
14 |
4 |
Roy Emerson |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
3 |
Rod Laver** |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
11 |
5 |
B. Borg |
0 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
11 |
5 |
Bill Tilden * |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
5 |
Ken Rosewall** |
4 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
7 |
Women |
||||||
Margaret Court |
11 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
24 |
5 |
Serena Williams |
7 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
23 |
10 |
Steffi Graff |
4 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
22 |
7 |
Helen Wills Moody* |
4 |
0 |
8 |
7 |
19 |
3 |
Chris Evert |
2 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
18 |
16 |
Martina Navratilova |
2 |
2 |
10 |
4 |
18 |
14 |
Billie Jean King |
1 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
12 |
6 |
Old Timer ** Missed playing time due to turning professional |
I have made the above table to aid in a closer inspection. The table was made possible almost entirely due to the valuable comprehensive information provided on the Internet, including Wikipedia. The table above is interesting. Some players have clearly proved their mettle on some particular surface compared to the rest. Most striking is the success of Rafael Nadal on the slow French Open courts in Ronald Garros, Paris. He was there 14 times out of his total of 22. This is indicative of his superior stamina but not as adept at fast serve and volleys as required in others, particularly on the grass courts in Wimbledon. In the case of Margaret Court and her 11 wins in the Australian Open, I wonder if it is not due to a paucity of competition in those early years as many women may avoided the long trip Down Under. In this context, perhaps the most interesting is the case of Bjorn Borg. He won 6 French titles on the slow clay and 5 Wimbledon titles on the fast grass – but never won the Australian or the US Open (where he reached the Finals on 3 occasions). Borg incidentally had a shorter career (10 years) compared to the rest and only participated in the Australian Open only once.
Now for my conclusions. I have every reason to conclude that Novak Djokovic is the Greatest Men’s singles tennis player of our time if not of all time. He has won 24 major titles, a record. He has distinguished himself by winning on all surfaces more than once. And he still probably has a few more years left. For women, the issue may be a little more complicated and more subjective. I would personally rate Serena Williams as the greatest Women’s Singles Tennis player of our time if not for all time. She clearly has a better all-round record compared to Margaret Court with her total of 13 wins in Wimbledon and the US Open, compared to Margaret’s 8 wins. In addition, she can boast of a record of 10 Runner-ups compared to Margaret’s five. Steffi Graf’s case is perhaps a little more contentious. She has only one less total win (22 versus Serena’s 23). Her record is well distributed over the 4 surfaces, including a total of 12 wins in Wimbledon and US Open. Perhaps I cannot readily rid myself of the thought of what might have been if the unfortunate occurrence of the stabbing of Monica Seles had not occurred. Steffi and Monica were very competitive prior to that event.
Appendix
As an afterthought, I felt Rod Laver’s achievements deserve some reexamination in light of the above article. Rod Laver surely has some legitimate claims for being chosen as the Greatest Men’s Singles Tennis Player of recent times. He won all the four Majors a total of 11 times. And this includes winning two Grand Slams – winning all four Majors in one calendar year (in 1963 and 1969). More importantly, he missed out 5 years of valuable playing time from 1963 to 1967 as he had turned professional, and professionals were barred from the Majors. That he won in 1961-1962 and again in 1968-1969 makes one wonder how many more titles he may have won between 1963 and 1967. One would never know whether he would have exceeded the 24 wins of Djokovic. In this context, one has also to consider that the circuit may not have been as competitive in Laver’s time as in the later years with the arrival of many top players from all over, particularly Eastern Europe. Another thing of note is that during Laver’s time, the Majors were dominated by grass courts. Australian and US Opens were still played on grass during his time. Thus, there is some difficulty in trying to readily compare his performances with the players of more recent vintage. I, therefore, maintain as before that at this point in time, Novak Djokovic is the Greatest Men’s Singles Tennis Player of our time if not for all time.
Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment